Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/OEMW25GJTNDVFIHARTBEJLEMWEKUV56F/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-10/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14263 (+51)
build-tried: 14233 (+52)
build-failed: 34 (-14)
build-n-a: 287 (-1)
build-succeeded: 13912 (+65)
build-official-failed+na: 54 (-637)
build-compare-failed: 397 (+2)
build-compare-succeeded: 13515 (+63)
verify-failed: 459 (+4)
verified-semi-reproducible: 13188 (+10)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13428 (+54)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 478 (+5)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 484 (+11)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211130/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
4 were in ring0
35 were in ring1

That makes it 39/3247 => 1.20 %
which is below the overall average of
397/13912 => 2.85 %

478/13912 => 3.44 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible