Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-08/msg00355.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-08/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13408 (+164) build-tried: 13401 (+165) build-failed: 26 (-40) build-n-a: 137 (+12) build-succeeded: 13238 (+193) build-official-failed+na: 214 (-109) build-compare-failed: 405 (-26) build-compare-succeeded: 12833 (+219) verify-failed: 514 (-5) verified-semi-reproducible: 12479 (+117) bit-by-bit-identical: 12694 (+206) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 524 (-34) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 544 (-13) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 2 were in ring0 46 were in ring1 That makes it 48/3369 => 1.42 % which is below the overall average of 405/13238 => 3.06 % 524/13238 => 3.96 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Newly unreproducible packages: python-scikit-learn nondeterminism from parallelism via cython+openmp other notable: kopete still suffers from https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186 libpinyin .bin files generated by cpp - maybe uninitialized memory Ciao Bernhard M.